SUPPLEMENTARY STUDY MATERIAL : ENGLISH I
Marriage Is a Private Affair
Introduction:
Chinua Achebe in
this short story ‘Marriage is a Private Affair’ talks about the life style of
the Ibo community who oppose love marriage. He also attacks the outdated
customs and beliefs of the Ibo tribal community.
Ibo tribe’s:
Nnaemeka, who
belongs to the Ibo community, falls in love with Nene of Lagos. On one
fine afternoon, Nene sits with Nnaemeka in her room at 16 Kasanga Street, Lagos
asking him whether he had written to his
father regarding their marriage. He
defends himself that it would be better to talk in person while he goes home.
Nnaemeka’s father
may not like Nene becoming his daughter-in-law. He feels that his Ibo tribes
are bound to customs and traditions. They insist on arranged marriages within
the tribe. Nene thinks in the cosmopolitan atmosphere of the city it is a
joke that a person’s tribe should decide marriage. Nene remarks that she
believed the Ibo tribes were kind people. To which Nnaemeka replies that
marriage was a different matter. He further adds, if Nene’s father
lived in the heart of Ibibo land he too would be exactly as his father.
Letter from Nnaemeka’s father:
Later he receives
a letter from his father stating that he had found a suitable girl named Ugoye
Nwede, the eldest daughter of Jacob Nweke. She is not totally illiterate
and she has a proper Christian upbringing. Her Sunday school teacher said
she reads bible very fluently. Nnaemeka thought of showing the letter to Nene,
but later decided not to on second thought.
Upon reaching his
home during his vacation, he sat with his father and began to speak about his
love with Nene Atang from Calabar. He said she is working as a
teacher. His father said that a Christian should not teach and he asked
his son for more details, and he left the room angrily.
Against Nnaemeka’s will:
The next day his
father called him and asked to cancel his engagement with Nene. But
Nnaemeka was firm and tried to convince his father saying that she is a good
Christian who has all the good qualities of Ugoye. Later the old man said
he would never see the girl and stopped speaking to his son. Nnaemeka
thought that his anger would pass away. That night, his father did not
eat. He feels that it was a duty of the father to show what is right and
wrong. He said to his father that he will change his mind after seeing Nene
Role of Villagers against their marriage:
The news of
Nnameka’s marriage proposal with Nene spread among the villagers. An old
man of the village said that he had never heard of a man marrying a girl
speaking a different language and the other man quoted the bible ‘Sons shall
rise against their Fathers’, which said the sons would disobey their
parents. Another said, the world was going to end. The discussions
assumed a religious tone.
Madubogwu
suggested that a native doctor should be consulted. An herbalist could
cure his sickness. The medicine Amalile could be tried on him. It would
help women to get back to their husbands. But Okeke refused to call in
the native doctor. But, Nnameka and Nene got married against his father’s wish
after a few days.
Few months later:
After six months Nnameka
received letters from his father who cut off his son’s wife from the marriage
photo and returned it back to his son stating that he has nothing to do with
Nene. She looks into the letter and begins to cry. Later Nnameka
consoles his wife saying that his father is an essentially good-natured man and
he will understand them one day. They both lived in a little village in
the heart of the Ibo country most happily but Okeke displayed much temper
whenever his son’s name was mentioned by the villagers. Though he had a
pain of missing his son, he never expressed it but controlled his feelings.
Letter from Daughter-in-law:
One day Okeke
received a letter from Nene. He could not control himself from reading
the letter. Nene said that their two sons were eager to meet their
grandfather. She requested her father-in-law to permit them to visit him.
Her husband would take the children during his leave and she would stay back in
Lagos.
Conclusion:
The old man’s
determination became weakened. He tried to steel his heart and control
his emotions. He leaned against a window and looked out. The sky was
overcast with heavy black cloud and high wind began to blow. Okeke was
trying hard not to think of his two grandsons, but he knew he was fighting a
losing battle. He imagined his grandsons standing outside, shut from
home. He later felt sorry for his action and he could not sleep that
night because of a deep regret for wrong doing a fear that he might die without
seeing his grandsons.
The
Doll’s House
Introduction:
Katherine
Mansfield in this story ‘The Doll’s House’
talks about three elements - they are child psychology, class distinction and
making fun of the society.
Burnell’s
family:
This story begins with the Burnell’s family where Mrs. Hay had stayed with them
and went back to town and had sent the children a doll’s house. It was a
beautiful doll house. The children are Isabel (eldest), Lottie (middle),
and Kezia (younger). They were happy to receive this gift from Mrs. Hay
which was carried into the courtyard by Pat who is the servant working in
Burnell’s family. The doll’s house was advised to be kept in the
courtyard because of the paint’s smell that came from the doll’s house.
Description
of the Doll’s house:
The doll’s house was painted with a dark, oily, spinach-green, picked out with
bright yellow. Its two solid little chimneys, glued on to the roof, were
painted red and white, and the door, gleaming with yellow varnish, was little
slab of toffee. Four windows, real windows were divided into panes by a
broad streak of green. It also contains a drawing room, a dining room, a
kitchen and two bedrooms. All the rooms were papered and the pictures on
the walls were painted with gold frames, whereas the red carpet covered all the
floors except the kitchen, the beds were covered with real bedclothes, a
cradle, a stove, a dresser with tiny plates and a big jug.
But what amazed Kezia was the lamp. It stood in the middle of the dining
room table, a little lamp with a white globe, and it was even filled all ready
for lightning, though, of course we couldn’t light it. It looked some kind of
oil was inside the lamp when we shook it. The Burnell children were so
elated and they wanted to tell the news to everyone. Isabel was bossy and
she said that only she has got the right to choose the friends whom she would
like to invite to look at the Doll’s house.
Kelvey’s
family:
Through the Kelvey’s family, the author highlights the class distinction.
The Kelvey’s were left out because they were the daughters of a washer woman
and a jail bird. They were shunned by everybody. Even teachers had
a special voice for them and a special smile for the other children. They
were the daughters of a hard-working little washerwoman. The children are Lil
(elder) and Else (younger). Lil was stout plain child and she came to
school in a dress made out of table cloth, whereas Else was dressed up in white
rather like a night gown and a pair of little boy’s boots. Both of them looked
very strange. Else a very silent girl and when she wanted something she use to
give Lil a little tug to her skirt. They never failed to understand each other.
Same
school:
As there are no other school for miles the rich Burnells had to send their
children to the same school where the poor Kelvey’s children studies. It
was a mixed school where the Judges little girls and the milkman’s children
were forced to study together. But the children still looked down upon
children from the poor families like the Kelvey’s and kept them at a distance.
Later that evening, Isabel chose Emmie Cole and Legan Logan to see the Doll’s
house first. The other girls would also have their chance. Only the
little Kelvey’s were not invited as they belonged to a poor family.
Kezia,
the kind-hearted:
The Burnell girl’s mother never allows her daughters to mix along with the
Kelveys. As days passed more children saw the doll’s house and the fame
of it spread. All the other girls use to make fun of the Kelveys girls
since her mother was a washerwoman and her father was a jail bird. But,
Kezia was the only one who took pity on the Kelvey’s and invited them to have a
look at the Doll’s house.
Kezia saw the Kelvey’s children near her and she invited them and showed the
Doll’s house. When they were looking at the doll’s house, Aunt Beryl who
saw it, scolded Kezia for allowing the Kelvey’s. She shooed the Kelvey’s
out as if they were chickens.
Conclusion:
Later Kelvey’s sat on the big red drainpipe by the side of the road looking at
the thick fences and Logan’s cows. Else
came up close to her sister and said ‘I seen the Little Lamp”, and the silence
prevailed once more.
Upper
Division Love
Introduction:
Manohar Malgonkar
in the short story ‘Upper Division Love’ talks about the lower division clerk
who falls in love with the film star Sunderbala, which later turns into agony,
anger and revenge.
Meeting with the film star:
This is the story
about the lower division clerk who held the photos of the film star Sunderbala,
three in his room and one in his wallet and he had seen every movie in which
she had acted. He had a great admiration for the film star. The
first time he meet her in real life was in a stationery counter of Buchumjee’s
Store wherein she was accompanied by two body guards. She had come there
to buy gold-plated fountain-pens with encrusted tops. Before the clerk
could speak, the shop assistant stepped forward to answer her.
But luck was in
his way, on the counter she had left behind her glasses and the clerk took it
as an opportunity to speak with her. Later the film star smiled at him
and said thank you. After that incident he knew that he had no business to fall
in love with the film star Sunderbala.
Clerk’s role in the movie:
Every day, before
going to office he waited near the Super Gajraj Film Company entrance with lots
of hope of catching a glimpse of Sunderbala. He saw her a dozen times,
but she did not care to look at him. There were no more smiles from her.
One fine morning he stood near the entrance of the studio feeling cheated
because the film star had not arrived for the shooting and suddenly an unshaved
man waved his hands towards the waiting group near the gate. The clerk
got an opportunity to play a role of a bandit. He was to move towards the
heroine and to give a tug to her necklace. It didn’t snap and come off,
so he pulled with his full strength and the actress shouted in pain.
Next take:
In the next take
Ramakanth, the hero of the movie jumped into the scene and he was to give the
clerk who acts as a bandit a light tap on his chin. Then he would fall
down. But Ramakanth hit him very hard. Then the narrator realized
that the hero of the movie had deliberately hit him. Sunderbala was laughing,
looking at all these things.
The Revenge:
What was given
life by a smile was burnt out by the laughter. The narrator did a
make-over as a policemen for the next scene, and the work assigned for him is
to drive up in the police van and put the handcuffs on Ramakanth, motion him
into the back of the van, lock the door and drive off with the cameras taking
shots of his handsome face through the grill wire. The narrator went
through the scene quiet as a lamb and when at the end he just raced the engine
of the van and turned for the road and crew had no idea what was happening.
Charity Show:
The narrator drove
the vehicle for an hour without any idea where he was going. He later
bought a cardboard and a bottle of red ink and he dipped his finger in the ink
and wrote out the sign in bold letter DANGEROUS LUNATIC KEEP AWAY. He
hung the board at the back of the van and drove through the busy streets until
reaching the Bolero theatre where they were having the charity show.
Since Ramakanth failed to take Sunderbala to the charity show the place beside
the Minister was occupied by the actress Shilamati who looked like a thousand
dreams.
Conclusion:
The narrator was
enchanted by the new actress Shilamati and decided to pursue her. The
story reveals the common man’s attraction for the film world, and film stars,
the realities of the film world, and the disappointment we get when we come
closer to it.
The
Ransom of Red Chief
Introduction:
O. Henry in his short story ‘The Ransom of the Red
Chief’ talks of the kidnappers who were tortured by a ten year old kid from
Summit named Johnny and at the end the boy is handed over to his father along
with cash.
Bill and Sam:
Sam is the
narrator of the story. He along with Bill (his companion) had a joint capital
of six hundred dollars. They needed just two thousand dollars more to
pull off a fraudulent town-lot scheme in Western Illinois. So, they
decided to kidnap someone and demand the needed (two thousand dollars) amount
as ransom. They both selected the victim – who has only one child, a
prominent citizen and a wealthy man named Ebenezer Dorset. Two miles from
Summit there was a cave, which they used to store provisions.
One evening, after
sunset they drove in a cart and went near Dorset’s house. The boy put up
a fight with Bill and Sam like a huge bear, but finally they managed to
overcome his stubborn resistance and got him in the bottom of the cart and took
him to the cave.
Johnny as ‘Red Chief’:
The cave was surrounded
with thick cedar tree. Later he wore feathers in his hair and called himself a
‘Red Chief’ and he also nick-named Sam as the Snake-eye, the Spy. He called
Bill, Old Hank, the Trapper. The Red chief’s captive and was going to be killed
at the day break. The little boy seemed to be having the time of his
life. Later they had dinner, the little boy Johnny filled his mouth with
bacon, bread and gravy, and began to talk.
Why are oranges
round? I don’t like girls, a parrot can talk, but a monkey or fish can’t. The
little boy started to threaten Bill and Sam. Later, they went to
sleep. Johnny often got up and yelled. In the early morning he sat
on Bill’s chest and tried to cut off his hair and skin with knife. The whole
night, both Sam and Bill lost their sleep.
Ransom Note from Bill and Sam:
Next morning, Sam
went to the top of the mountain to examine the situation in Summit. But quite
opposite to their expectations the village was very quiet and the people of
Summit were yet to discover the kidnap. Meanwhile the kid started to
torture Bill in the cave. Sam rescued Bill after he returned to the cave from
the top of the mountain. He suggested his companion that they should send
a letter to Dorset demanding the ransom and instructing him how to pay
it.
Bill pleaded with
Sam to reduce the amount to fifteen hundred dollars as he suspected that his
father wouldn’t be willing to pay a bigger amount for a troublesome boy.
They wrote a letter demanding fifteen hundred dollars as ransom for returning
his son.
Johnny’s torture continued:
Sam went out to
send a letter to Mr. Dorset demanding the amount. Now, the little kid
asked Bill to play along with him and asked him to get down on four legs.
He rode on Bill’s back to the village stockade, as a game. After posting
the letter, Sam returned back to the cave, but he found none. He waited
for Bill in the cave for a long time and about half an hour later he heard the
bushes rustle. He saw Bill who looked tired and shabby. He said
that the boy is gone and he had sent him home. Bill tried to get rid of
the boy but he followed him back to the cave.
Later that
night, Bill and Sam got a letter from Mr. Dorset stating that, instead of
paying the ransom, he had demanded money from Bill and Sam. They had to pay in
cash(two hundred and fifty dollars) to take his son off their hands. They
should come with the boy in the night time because the neighbors might object
to his returning home and might attack the kidnappers.
Conclusion:
Bill and Sam
wanted to get rid of the boy somehow and they decided to pay the amount
demanded by Mr. Dorset. They both paid the amount (two hundred and fifty
dollars) as demanded by the little boy’s father and ran away from that town as
fast as they could, thinking that the boy could catch up with them again.
The
Man Who Knew Too Much
Private Quelch:
The story opens up
with the description of the character named Private Quelch, who works as the
soldier, the lowest rank in the army. He was lean and tall, wearing
horn-rimmed glasses and had a permanent frown on his face. He was given
the nickname the ‘Professor’. At the first chance, he began to lecture to
anyone on anything much like a Professor. Hence he was aptly called the
‘Professor’. He looked like a professor both in his appearance and
conduct.
Perfect Show off:
At first he was
respected for his knowledge in all fields. He worked hard and gathered
knowledge from various sources, but he grabbed every opportunity to show off
his knowledge. The narrator points out Private Quelch’s first incident of
interruption during the class handled by the sergeant on Musketry (use of
rifle). When he started with his lecture on the mechanism of a Service Rifle
and the velocity or speed at which the bullet leaves the rifle like over two
thousand feet per second, a voice interrupted saying two thousand four hundred
and forty feet per second. The Sergeant without any enthusiasm went on
lecturing.
When the sergeant
asked “You had any training before?” the professor answered “No sergeant, it’s
all a matter of intelligent reading.” Others in the army camp
started to learn about him and his ambition to earn a Commission, which is the
highest rank in the army. He borrowed training manuals and stayed up late
at nights reading them.
Relationship with his Colleagues:
He often pointed
out other’s mistakes and corrected them in the public. Whenever one of
colleagues shone the “Professor”, he outshone them with his lectures.
This was not liked by all. The colleagues tried to hit him back with
clumsy sarcasms and practical jokes but he was never affected by them.
One day, they heard the drone of a plan flying high overhead. None of
them could even see it in the glare of the sun. Without even a glance
upward the Professor announced it is a North American Harvard Trainer.
With utmost pride the Professor wanted to show off his talent and knowledge to
his colleagues.
Corporal Turnbull:
He was a young man
who came back from Dunkirk with all his equipment correct. One day he was
giving lecture on the hand grenade. He lectured that the outside of a
grenade we can see large number of fragment to assist segmentation and by that
time a voice interrupted his lecture. The Professor as usual interrupted
him saying Forty four segments. Corporal did not like this. He gave
the hand grenade to the professor and asked him to give the lecture. The
Professor happily came forward and gave a good lecture on the hand
grenade. The squad listened to him with a horrified kind of
silence. Corporal stood and watched his lecture.
A Kind Revenge:
Corporal Turnbull
announced that he was asked by the ‘Platoon officer (lieutenant) to nominate
one from the squad for ---‘. He paused and looked at the squad and most
of them started to throw their glances at Private Quelch who stood rigid.
Everyone thought that the Professor would be given a Commission. “—for
permanent cookhouse duties and Corporal have decided that Private Quelch is
just the man for the job and everyone enjoyed this joke. He was not at
all put out by this.
Conclusion:
Through the open
doors of the canteen the squad, the other ranks of army and his colleagues saw
three cooks standing against the wall, and from within came a familiar
voice. Later they recognized that the voice belonged to the Professor who
started his lecture about unscientific and unhygienic method of peeling
potatoes and vitamin values. Though he had lot of knowledge, he lacked
humility.
Lines
Written in Early Spring
Wordsworth rejoices and laments at the same time, dwelling on the
connection between man and nature.
Listening to the sounds of nature on a pleasant day in spring, he is
full of sadness on account of what man has made of himself. He notes, observing
the blooming flowers, chirping birds and the fresh new foliage, that all of
Nature, seems happy, in accordance with the divine plan. Humans, however, much
to the poet’s regret are the exception to the all pervading principle of
pleasure found in nature.
The speaker
describes the natural scenery around. To him, the life in the forest seems so
beautiful and satisfying compared to life in civilization. He goes on to
describe what he sees as “pleasure” as “every flower/Enjoys the air it
breathes” and the birds that hopped and played around him and that every least
motion which they made “seemed a thrill of pleasure”. Next, he proceeds to
describe pleasure in the “budding twigs” that which spreads their leaves to
catch the “breezy air”. It is this lifestyle that the speaker is jealous and
wishes that mankind could somehow return to nature. It is for this reason he
pities humankind for their empty pursuits and their meaningless life.
To Wordsworth,
“Natures holy plan” (22) is for mankind to live as an intricate (involving)
part of nature, surrendering to quiet cottages and subsistence farming, away
from the bleak and pointless miseries of city life. Man, in “Lines
Written in Early Spring”, has successfully perverted his nature and is so
condemned to the incomplete and aimless existence of civilization.
Ulysses
Ulysses declares that there is little point in his staying
home “by this still hearth” with his old wife, giving out rewards and
punishments for the people who live in his kingdom. Still speaking to himself
he declares that he “cannot rest from travel” but feels compelled to live to
the fullest and swallow every last drop of life. He has enjoyed all his
experiences as a sailor who travels the seas, and he considers himself a symbol
for everyone who wanders and roams the earth. His travels have exposed him to
many different types of people and ways of living. They have also exposed him
to the “delight of battle” while fighting the Trojan War with his men. Ulysses
declares that his travels and encounters have shaped who he is: “I am a part of
all that I have met,” he asserts. Ulysses declares that it is boring to stay in
one place, and that to remain stationary is to rust rather than to shine; to
stay in one place is to pretend that all there is to life is the simple act of
breathing. His spirit yearns constantly for new experiences that will
broaden his horizons; he wishes “to follow knowledge like a sinking star” and
forever grow in wisdom and in learning.
Ulysses now speaks to an unidentified
audience concerning his son Telemachus, who will act as his successor while the
great hero resumes his travels: he says, “This is my son, mine own Telemachus,
to whom I leave the scepter (authority) and the isle (island).” He speaks
highly but also supports his son’s capabilities as a ruler, praising his
careful management, dedication, and devotion to the gods. Telemachus will do
his work of governing the island while Ulysses will do his work of traveling
the seas: “He works his work, I mine.”
In the final stanza, Ulysses addresses the mariners
with whom he has worked, traveled, and weathered life’s storms over many years.
He declares that although he and they are old, they still have the potential to
do something noble and honorable before “the long day wanes.” He encourages
them to make use of their old age because “’tis not too late to seek a newer
world.” He declares that his goal is to sail onward “beyond the sunset” until
his death. Perhaps, he suggests, they may even reach the “Happy Isles,” or the
paradise of never ending summer described in Greek mythology where great heroes
like the warrior Achilles were believed to have been taken after their deaths.
Although Ulysses and his mariners are not as strong as they were in youth, they
are “strong in will” and are sustained by their resolve to push onward
relentlessly: “To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.”
WHEN I HAVE FEARS
Introduction:
Keats is
reflecting on his imminent death in this poem. He talks about his fears of
leaving the world before realizing his dreams and literary ambitions. He is
afraid that he might be dead before penning down all his ideas into books,
fulfilling his destiny and falling in love. It is when such thoughts occur to
him that he feels he is all alone in the world and his ideas of love and fame
amount to nothing. The escapist tendency has only served to heighten the sense
of reality. Keats understands that his desire for fame and love has to
withstand the test of time but which is just futile.
His
Fears: The poem has two major thought groups
culminating into one at the end. The first being Keats fear of dying young
without becoming a successful literary writer – his long term ambition and the
second the fear of losing his beloved. Keats emphasizes the richness of his
imagination through the imagery of harvest. With his imagination he can
perceive the beauty of nature and the larger meanings beneath the appearance of
nature. Next he turns to his beloved – ‘the fair creature of an hour’ but his
beloved is not a eternal being.
His conception of Love: Keats resolves
his fear by asserting the unimportance of love and fame as both are transient in
nature. Keats attributes two qualities to love: (1) it has the ability to
transform the world for the lovers ("faery power"), but of course
fairies are not real, and their enchantments are an illusion and (2) love
involves us with emotion rather than thought ("I feel" and
"unreflecting love").
His Solitariness: Reflecting upon his feelings, which the act
of writing this sonnet has involved, Keats achieves some distancing from his
own feelings and ordinary life; this distancing enables him to reach a resolution.
He thinks about the human solitariness ("I stand alone") and human
insignificance (the implicit contrast between his lone self and "the wide
world"). The shore is a point of contact, the threshold between two worlds
or conditions, land and sea; so Keats is crossing a threshold, from his desire
for fame and love to accepting their unimportance and ceasing to fear and
sadness.
OBITUARY
Ramanujan
uses the occasion of his father’s death to pay him a tribute. While doing so,
he portrays the milieu to which his father belonged in graphic detail. The
poet’s father belongs to an orthodox middle-class Brahmin community. His
passing away is a significant event for his family and his contribution to the
society merits an obituary in a Chennai Newspaper. His death, however, means
little in a community that upholds the traditions and rituals of the past,
rather than an individual and his achievements. He is cremated and his ashes
scattered as per the Hindu rites, but no tombstone is engraved in his name. it is
the same modesty that prompts the writer to seek unobstructively for the lines
published in honour of his father amongst the newspaper cones given by the
shopkeepers.
The poem
is rich in references to the small town life of the poet’s father and his family,
undistinguished, except for the predictable practices such as naming a child
after his grandfather, the ritual of cremating the dead, an old house in a
state of disrepair, groceries sold in recycled newspaper and the image of a
widowed woman.
The Unknown Citizen
Introduction:
W. H.
Auden’s poem ‘The Unknown Citizen’ is a satire on the societal order in which the
State is all-powerful and has total control over the individual. In “The
Unknown Citizen” the government has manipulated human intelligence to the point
that they have control over everyone’s lives and minds. The motive behind the
portrayal of an equal society is that it will eliminate hatred, envy and war.
While this proves true, the numerous side effects such as loss of identity,
lack of originality, and loss of personal feelings develop.
The unknown
citizen is someone who pays the taxes, satisfies the employers, reads the
newspaper daily, has the correct number of children, fights for the peace and
supports the war and so on. In spite of all these facts, the citizen remains
"unknown" we do not see any strong traits in this unknown citizen. He
is merely like any other ordinary man we can find around us. We could not see
how special he appears or anything that could distinguish him from
others. The stress for individuals to conform in this system makes one
loses his or her individualism.
Reports by Researchers on the Unknown
Citizen:
The poem consists of several people and
organizations weighing our dear "Citizen." First, the
not-so-friendly-sounding "Bureau of Statistics" says that "no
official complaint" was ever made against him. More than that, the guy was
a veritable saint, whose good deeds included serving in the army and not
getting fired. He belonged to a union and paid his dues, and he liked to have a
drink from time to time. " He served in war, never got fired from
his job, popular with his mates, and "normal in every
way."
This man was an
ordinary man who did what a normal man would do, and what an ordinary would
have. The "researchers in Public Opinion are content that he held the
proper opinions for the time of the year: “ when there was peace, he was for
peace; when there was war, he went."
His list of stirring accomplishments goes on: he bought a newspaper and had
normal reactions to advertisements. He went to the hospital once – we don’t know
what for – and bought a few expensive appliances like a record player, a radio,
and the refrigerator. He had five kids, and they added to it by telling
that he did not interfere in their education. In fact, the only thing the
government doesn’t know about the guy is whether he was "free" and
"happy," two utterly insignificant, trivial little details. They
themselves came to a conclusion that he couldn’t have been unhappy, though,
because otherwise the government would have heard.
For Elkana
Introduction:
Ezekiel describes a typical domestic situation in this
autobiographical poem through which he poignantly brings out the joys of the
familial bonds. The poet uses the situation to portray with gentle irony his
wife’s personality and to comment on the everyday dilemmas of raising young
children. Elkana is the name of Ezekiel’s son.
The
parents of a strong-willed seven year old are relaxing in their lawn one early
summer evening, when their tete-a-tete is interrupted by their son, who demands
that he be given dinner immediately. The mother persuade him to wait for a few
minutes, as the father looks on. The boy has his way however, as he presents
strong logic, much to the amusement of his parents.
Domestic Situation: The
author and his family, tempted by the warm April evening, decide to drag their
chairs outside and plant them on the uneven stone steps. There, they sit
sprawled in their chairs, in silence till the wife breaks this silence by
commenting on a broken window pane. She suggests a thing or two to her husband,
assuming that he doesn't know what he is supposed to do. She might even be
aware of the fact that he knows, but it’s just the comfort of replaying a
familiar conversation they have had many times over the years, which prompts
her to tell him these things.
The Dilemma’s of Married Life: The husband doesn't want to contradict her
and understands the futility of arguing. He decides to maintain peace by humorously
accepting that she is always right! They both accept each other’s faults and
put up with each other because the bond they share is much deeper than what’s
seen on the surface. Even though she might nag him and he might ignore her at
times and though they disagree on many accounts, they both love each other
immensely.
The
Joy within the Family: The
son, who was playing in the garden, hears his mother's voice travelling up and
down the lawn and for some reason this reminds him that he needs his dinner. He
goes up to his parents, and demands his dinner with "masterly
determination". At this point, both the author and his wife, in unusual
rapport, state one unspoken thought- their son must be disciplined. The wife
expects her husband to discipline the boy but he looks away. Before her boy
could repeat himself, she raises her finger and tells him firmly that he will
have to wait for five minutes. When he doesn't listen, she tries pacifying him
but to no avail. The young boy's logic is that he won't be hungry in five
minutes. This argument appeals to the father and reminds him of himself. The
father feels that such a logician deserves his dinner straightaway. Even the
mother is amused by her son and laughs in delight! Both parents end up
indulging their son. Her wonderful laughter holds the family together and all
three of them rise to go back into the house.
A Little Bit of What You Fancy
A Little Bit of What You Fancy
Introduction:
Desmond Morris in his ‘A Little
Bit of What You Fancy’ talks about his own mother and the people who lived
during the 18th century who were least bothered about the health
foods and diet regimes.
Morris’ mother in tune with 18th
century:
Desmond Morris
talks about his own mother who was born during the reign of Queen Victoria, and
she enjoyed the robust food pleasures (less importance to healthy foods, table
manners), she ate with lots of gusto piling her plate with greasy, fatty, fried
up grill foods without any anxiety about their possible bad effects. It
is advisable to chew each mouthful of food thirty-two times before
swallowing. Watching his mother in action, Morris wanted to match her
appetite and he also remarked that if she ignores the words of health gurus and
diet experts, she would die young.
Simple truth behind her mother:
She lived the
whole of twentieth century (99 years of age) without even giving a moment’s
thought to know what was correct to eat. If it tasted good it was
all right for her. Her lack of anxiety (worry) about the diet kept her
fit. For a good digestion you need to be perfectly relaxed in what we are
eating. Only then, the parasympathetic nervous system will help us in
good digestion. We should never worry about our diet system when we start
to eat. On the other hand if we eat in fear and tension our body refuses
to co-operate and would suffer from cancer which induces effects from the
nervous system.
Modern Pontificators:
Now a day the
modern pontificators (one who gives their opinion) feels that, it is their duty
to tell the rest of us about what we should and should not eat, as though they
have discovered the secrets of the eternal life. The author feels that
there are two flaws in their argument. First, they keep on changing their
views. Secondly, they had
overlooked the fact that the human species evolved as an omnivore and hence
require a wide range of food stuffs for the body to pick out what it needs and
discards the rest. It’s the food, that differentiates us from our animal
rivals.
Problems faced by human beings:
Many people suffer
from obesity, indigestion and dietary deficiencies. The answer lies in
their lifestyle. They don’t realize that man needs a variety of food for
good health. For an instance take the stress ridden urban population suffering
from digestion related inconveniences. Food should be savoured, relished,
enjoyed and digested at leisure.
Food taboos and totems:
According to the author,
there are two reasons for the existence of so many food taboos, namely totems
(special respect to religious emblem) and poisons. People from ancient
times chose a particular animal as a mascot a god-figure and tried to protect
it. For example: cows are considered to be sacred for the Hindus.
This protection included not eating it. Another reason was the
deep-seated human fear of being poisoned. This irrational fear makes
people avoid certain foods and causes anxiety when we eat anything for
enjoyment.
Conclusion:
The Author feels
that we should never consider the words of food experts or diet gurus. He also
thought that he would die ten year ago and in mean time he would like to try
out the food stuffs prepared by various cooks. Later he managed to live for
another ten years since he managed to disrespect the words of diet fascists .
So, we should enjoy all kinds of foods and without bothering too much the advice
of diet experts.
Headache
Introduction:
R.K. Narayan in
his essay ‘Headache’ explains the advantages of headache.
A blessing for Mankind:
R.K. Narayan
explains how headache conferred on mankind as a blessing by a benign providence
and also talks about the usefulness of headache to avoid difficult
situations. He later narrates an incident in his school life about the
letter writing exercise, where his teacher used headache as a cause in the
specimen letter. He always wondered what made his teacher to select for
headache as a cause even in a specimen letter. Later he talks about the drill
class during his school days and how students usually mentioned ‘headache’ as
an excuse for avoiding the drill class after the school hours. One day
the instructor asked all the students suffering from headache to hold their
arms. For many students it raised large hope. The instructor also added
that he was going to give them some special exercise to cure their splitting
headache. Not even a boy raised his arms. Thus the instructor put an end
to that problem.
Touch of Importance:
Headache gives the
sufferer a touch of importance because it can be mentioned in any social
gathering and is well taken. No other pain can be so openly mentioned
with freedom from punishment. Other aches sound crude and bad which
cannot be mentioned in public and thus headache helps us to avoid many
embarrassing situation.
What is indisposition?
Indisposition is a
superior expression; it can be used only by eminent people. R. K. Narayan
was really concerned about finding the real meaning of the word indisposition
since it is very vague and confusing. He feels that he was not able to
understand the meaning of the word indisposition except that it sounds very
well in press notes or health bulletins or in messages from eminent men to
gatherings to which they have been invited. It cannot be written directly
and it will sound better in the third person. A gentlemen is an eminent
one, has a secretary or a deputy who can speak for him. For example a
gentleman regrets his inability to attend the meeting today owing to
indisposition (sickness or unwillingness). People will understand and
accept the statement and will not question the concerned person.
R.K. Narayan wants
to know the perfect meaning of indisposition. Is the concerned person
down with flu or malaria or cold or rheumatism (pain in joints and
muscles)? He feels that the word indisposition could be used only at a
particular level, not by all and if a school boy says “As I am indisposed, I
want to be let off”, he will have his ears twisted for his intelligence beyond
his age.
Headache as an excuse:
If we openly say
that we want to avoid the situation or an important meeting, people will get
angry. No one has really got courage to tell that he/she is not willing
to attend a meeting or a social gathering. The world is not yet ripe for such
outspokenness and frankness. So we safely use headache as an excuse.
At home, headache
is used as an excuse to avoid many uncomfortable situations. The
mother-in-law, who is angry with the daughter-in-law, uses it to avoid
food. The son, who does not want to take his wife out, gives headache as
an excuse. The boy, who has skipped his homework, claims headache in
order to avoid his tutor and to send him back away. The cultured
existence is not to interfere too deeply, but to accept the face value as
expressed by the speaker.
Conclusion:
Headache has
become a confirmed habit. Lots of medicines have been produced to cure
headache, which people always carry with them and feels uneasy without
them. Opticians give glasses to cure and relieve headache. All
these things prove that mankind easily begins to believe in myths.
My
Early Days
Kalam’s Childhood:
Kalam was born in Rameswaram and his
father Jainulabdeen was a middle class Muslim. His father had neither
much of formal education nor much wealth yet he had generosity of spirit and
wisdom. His mother Ashiamma was quite generous in providing food for outsiders
and Kalam recollects his memory as to how he sat with the outsiders and ate
every day. His parents were widely regarded as an ideal couple. He was
one among the several children in his family with distinguished looks born to
tall and handsome parents.
Location of his house:
He lived in his
ancestral house which was build in the middle of 19th century and it
was a fairly large pucca house built up of limestone and brick on the Mosque
Street in Rameswaram. His parents took care of his needs. He ate
with his mother on the floor of the kitchen, on which she served rice with
aromatic sambhar and with a variety of sharp pickle and a dollop of coconut
chutney.
Jainulabdeen, a pious Muslim:
Kalam describes an old mosque
in his locality where his father used to take him every evening. He never
had any idea of the Arabic prayers chanted but he was convinced that they
reached God. When his father came out of the mosque after the prayers,
people of different religions would be sitting outside waiting for him.
He used to dip his finger inside the bowl of water and say prayers to cure
diseases. Many came home to thank his father after they got cured.
He always smiled and asked them to thank Allah.
His father’s close
friend named Pakshi Lakshmana Sastry would always discuss about spiritual
matters with him. Kalam, asked his father about the relevance of prayers
and he replied that there is nothing so mysterious about prayers. It is a
communion of the spirit and the people. He is capable of explaining
difficult religious concepts in a simple manner.
Kalam’s inspiration:
Abdul Kalam tried to follow his
father as an example in his life. When he was six years old his father
was working on a project to build a wooden sailboat. He sat beside him and
admired his work. Ahmed Jallaluddin who married Kalam’s sister Zohara,
helped his father. Later he narrates about a disastrous wind which
collapsed a train full of passengers in Pamban Bridge. Ahmed turned to be
his friend though there is a difference in their age. They walked along
the sea shore discussing on spiritual matters. Their first halt would be
near Lord Shiva temple, and they talked about God and relationship with him.
Though
Ahmed’s education was limited, he was the only person in the island who can
speak and write English. He always speaks about scientific discoveries,
contemporary literature and achievements of medical sciences and widened his
knowledge. He encouraged Kalam to read and borrow books from the library
of S.T.R Manickam, a former militant nationalist.
His Second Inspiration:
Samsuddin,
cousin of Kalam was the next person to inspire him greatly. He was the
sole distributor for newspapers in Rameswaram. The newspapers would
arrive from Pamban. These newspapers were mainly bought by the reading
demands of 1000 strong literate people who lived in Rameswaram and few readers
would discuss Hilter, Mahatma Gandhi and Jinnah. Kalam collected the bundles of
newspapers thrown from train and earned his first wage. The Second World
War broke out in 1939 when he was eight years old. He used to collect
tamarind seeds and sell it to a provision shop. Jallaludin would tell him
stories about war and he talks about the solitariness of his locality after
war.
Kalam’s Close friends:
He had three close
childhood friends- Ramanadha Sastry, Aravindan and Sivaprakasan.
All these children were from orthodox Hindu Brahmin families. Ramanadha
Sastry was the son of Pakshi Lakshaman Sastry, and later he took priesthood of
Rameswaram temple; Aravindan went into business of arranging transport for
visiting pilgrims; Sivaprakasan became a catering contractor for Southern
Railways.
Science Teacher:
One day when he
was in his fifth standard at Elementary School a new teacher came to his
class. He never could digest a Hindu and a Muslim student sitting
together. He asked Kalam to sit in the last row and later he went home
and told his parents about the incident. Lakshmana Sastry summoned the
teacher and asked not to poison the minds of children with social
inequality. Later his science teacher Siva Subramania Iyer an orthodox
Brahmin who tried to break the social barriers helped Kalam in studies and
later he joined in high-school for his higher education. Kalam was
invited to his home for a meal but his wife refused to serve him. Later his
teacher served him the dinner.
Higher education:
After the Second
World War, India’s freedom was eminent. He asked his father’s permission
to leave Rameswaram and study at the district headquarters in
Ramanathapuram. Later his father took him along with his three brothers
to the mosque and recited prayers from the Holy Quran, and wished ‘May God
Bless You, my child’. Samsuddin and Ahmed Jallaluddin travelled with him
till high-school.
Conclusion:
Due to his
homesickness, he found hard to fit in with the new environment. He used
to recollect the words of Jallaluddin who always spoke about the power of
positive thinking whenever he felt homesick or dejected. He strived hard
to control his thoughts and his mind was filled up with the memories of his
home town. He used positive thinking and overcame his
home-sickness.
How
to Escape From Intellectual Rubbish
Rules to avoid foolish opinions:
According to
Russell many issues can be settled by personal observation. To avoid any
foolish opinion which makes mankind look inclined, no superhuman genius is
required to rectify our mistakes. Personal observation can keep us from
silly error. Russell supports his view by pointing out the mistake
committed by the great philosopher Aristotle. He could have avoided the
mistake of thinking that women have fewer teeth than men, by the simple method of
asking his wife to keep her mouth open while he counted. He did not do so
because he thought that he knew. Russell says that many writers who knew
less about unicorns and salamander spoke about them in their works but none of
the writers had ever seen them.
Contrary opinions:
If an opinion
contrary to your own makes you angry, it shows that your views are not based on
strong evidence. If someone says that two and two are five or that
Iceland is on the equator, you feel pity on them rather than getting angry,
unless you know little of mathematics or geography, otherwise his opinion will
make you feel contrary and makes you angry. The most heated arguments
rise up in theology, since there is no evidence either way. Whenever we
find ourselves getting angry about a difference of opinion, we should always
re-examine our views.
Insular prejudice:
According to
Bertrand Russell, a good way of overcoming dogmatism (one is right and other is
wrong) is to become aware of different opinions by travelling to different
countries. He travelled through many countries and observed their
cultures and traditions which made him to diminish his intensity of insular
prejudice (dislike of particular group). In some cases, the effect may
not be beneficial. When the Manchus invaded the Chinese, it was custom of
Chinese for the women to have small feet and among Manchus for the men to wear
pigtails. Instead of dropping their customs, the two countries adopted
each other’s custom. Chinese continued to wear pigtails until the
revolution of 1911.
Imaginary arguments:
The author feels
that, we can have imaginary arguments with a person with different views about
the technology like Gandhiji. Mahatma Gandhi disapproved railways and
steamboats and machinery. He wanted to undo the Industrial Revolution, but
for the Westerners most people take the advantage of modern technology.
Such imaginary arguments helped Russell to overcome his dogmatism.
Self-esteem:
He warns us
against the views that flatter our self-respect. It is a general human
opinion which makes them think that their own sex or country is superior to
others. Men think that all the poets, inventors and scientists are male,
but women feel most of them are criminals. We hide the demerits of our
country in order to show off the merits possessed by our nations. There
may be beings superior to us in other parts of the universe which may think us
very inferior by the same way how we feel superior to jelly fish.
Steps to avoid fear:
Fear according to
Russell is the root cause of all errors. Fear sometimes operates directly by
inventing rumours of disaster in war time or by imagining objects such as
ghosts, sometimes it operates indirectly by creating belief in something such
as heaven for ourselves and hell for our enemies. Fear has many forms,
fear of death, fear of the dark, fear of the unknown, fear of herd. There
are two ways of avoiding fear. One is by convincing ourselves that we are
safe from disaster. The other is by the practice of pure courage which is
difficult for many people. So people prefer the former method and try to
secure safety with the help of talismans, spells, witchcraft and
incantations.
Conclusion:
During the
fifteenth, sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, witches and sorcerers
(witchcraft) were used to overcome fear. Socrates on the day of his death
expressed his belief that, in the next world (heaven) he/she would be
accompanied by Gods and heroes but Plato in his work ‘Republic’ argued his
views about next world. He argued that the information given by Socrates
weren’t true, but to make soldiers more willing to die in battle. He
feels that the traditional myth about Hades (river of Death) represents the
spirits of the dead as unhappy. Belief in future life proves to be more
effective way of overcoming fear.
The
Key to Courage
Introduction:
I.A.R Wylie in his ‘The Key to
Courage’ argues that fear can be useful to kindle our courage and to bring out
our best.
Significance of Fear:
According to I.A.R
Wylie fear plays a vital role in bringing out our hidden capabilities.
She posed a question to herself: “When was I (author) happiest?” She was struck
with an unexpected answer. She enjoyed herself the most when she had been badly
scared. Fear makes it possible to trust in one’s own self to face
difficulty or danger. As a young child she was fearless and she had an
unusual upbringing. She was isolated from children and she used to travel
all alone. When she first went to school at the age of fourteen, she
caught fear from the other children brought up by orthodox methods. She
turned very nervous and shy. But, whenever she met with danger, her fear
aroused in her with unsuspected powers.
Her personal Experience:
When she first
went to United States her publishers expected her to give a speech in a public
dinner. She was almost sick with fear. Her tongue was tied up with
shyness. Later she gave speech like a seasoned speaker. She realized that
she needed fear to spur her talents. Even the actors, singers and public
performers agree that unless they fear they are not likely to give a good
performance.
Soldier’s Fear:
Bravest
soldiers are not ‘fearless’. It is found that soldiers are those who go
to battle sweating with fear. Army doctors observed that it is not the
tough guy who endure the stress of war, but those who imagine fearful
consequences to themselves and to others for whom they are responsible.
“Fear when rightly used is the father of courage”.
In 1942, she
was invited by British government with several other writers to observe how
Britain stood during various difficult situations. She was afraid to
travel by flight to Great Britain during the war time. But, after her
journey she felt refreshing and vigorous. Without fear there is no real
courage. It is the power to face any kind of challenge in life.
Fear stimulates our energy and mind.
Noel’s experience:
An English writer,
Noel Streatfield once told her that she was on her way to Singapore by ship and
the passengers became very unfriendly through her journey. The captain
met Noel on the deck and asked her to give a hint to the passengers that the
ship might suffer from the teeth of a hurricane. After hearing it the
passengers developed high spirits and good temper with her through her journey.
Fear of losing Job:
The
author’s friend was nervous and shy. One day when he was called to the
office of his vice-president, his worry turned into fear. Worry isn’t
same as the fear. A change came over him and he faced his superiors in a
light- headed mood. The interview ended in a handshake and her friend was
promoted afterwards.
Conclusion:
Fear has spurred
him to do his best. Fear when rightly used can do miracles in life.
Fear can make humans develop superhuman qualities. Thus ‘Fear is the
Father of Courage’.
No comments:
Post a Comment